A new method to improve the objectivity of early Six Sigma analysis. Issue 9 (3rd October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A new method to improve the objectivity of early Six Sigma analysis. Issue 9 (3rd October 2016)
- Main Title:
- A new method to improve the objectivity of early Six Sigma analysis
- Authors:
- Cox, Steven
Elton, Virginia
Garside, John A.
Kotsialos, Apostolos
Marmo, João Victor
Cunha, Lorena
Lennon, Grant
Gill, Chris - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: A process improvement sampling methodology, known as process variation diagnostic tool (PROVADT), was proposed by Cox et al. (2013). The method was designed to support the objectivity of Six Sigma projects performing the measure-analyse phases of the define-measure-analyse-improve-control cycle. An issue in PROVADT is that it is unable to distinguish between measurement and product variation in the presence of a poor Gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) result. The purpose of this paper is to improve and address PROVADT's sampling structure by enabling a true Gage R&R as part of its design. Design/methodology/approach: This paper derives an enhanced PROVADT method by examining the theoretical sampling constraints required to perform a Gage R&R study. The original PROVADT method is then extended to fulfil these requirements. To test this enhanced approach, it was applied first to a simulated manufacturing process and then in two industry case studies. Findings: The results in this paper demonstrates that enhanced PROVADT was able to achieve a full Gage R&R result. This required 20 additional measurements when compared to the original method, but saved up to ten additional products and 20 additional measurements being taken in future experiments if the original method failed to obtain a valid Gage R&R. These benefits were highlighted in simulation and industry case studies. Originality/value: The work into the PROVADT method aims to improve theAbstract : Purpose: A process improvement sampling methodology, known as process variation diagnostic tool (PROVADT), was proposed by Cox et al. (2013). The method was designed to support the objectivity of Six Sigma projects performing the measure-analyse phases of the define-measure-analyse-improve-control cycle. An issue in PROVADT is that it is unable to distinguish between measurement and product variation in the presence of a poor Gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) result. The purpose of this paper is to improve and address PROVADT's sampling structure by enabling a true Gage R&R as part of its design. Design/methodology/approach: This paper derives an enhanced PROVADT method by examining the theoretical sampling constraints required to perform a Gage R&R study. The original PROVADT method is then extended to fulfil these requirements. To test this enhanced approach, it was applied first to a simulated manufacturing process and then in two industry case studies. Findings: The results in this paper demonstrates that enhanced PROVADT was able to achieve a full Gage R&R result. This required 20 additional measurements when compared to the original method, but saved up to ten additional products and 20 additional measurements being taken in future experiments if the original method failed to obtain a valid Gage R&R. These benefits were highlighted in simulation and industry case studies. Originality/value: The work into the PROVADT method aims to improve the objectivity of early Six Sigma analyses of quality issues, which has documented issues. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of quality & reliability management. Volume 33:Issue 9(2016)
- Journal:
- International journal of quality & reliability management
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Issue 9(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 9 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0033-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1364
- Page End:
- 1393
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10-03
- Subjects:
- Design of experiments -- Six Sigma -- Process capability -- Quality measurement -- Sampling plan -- Shainin
Quality control -- Periodicals
658.562 - Journal URLs:
- http://info.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijqrm ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-671X.htm ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ijqrm.htm ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2015-0023 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0265-671X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.510000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1534.xml