Assessing subjective memory complaints: a comparison of spontaneous reports and structured questionnaire methods. (3rd July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessing subjective memory complaints: a comparison of spontaneous reports and structured questionnaire methods. (3rd July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Assessing subjective memory complaints: a comparison of spontaneous reports and structured questionnaire methods
- Authors:
- Burmester, Bridget
Leathem, Janet
Merrick, Paul - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Background: Subjective memory complaints (SMCs) are a common occurrence for adults, which increase with age, and cause considerable distress. Traditionally SMCs have been assessed by either questionnaires, which ask whether a person has experienced given examples of SMCs, or open-ended questions which elicit spontaneous reports of SMCs. However, little is known about how these methods of assessment might influence reporting of SMCs. Methods: Four hundred and twenty one adults aged 40 years and above were surveyed about SMCs using spontaneous report and questionnaire methods. Results: As expected, spontaneously reported SMCs were fewer in number and rated more distressing overall than SMCs endorsed on a questionnaire. However, comparison of individual SMCs revealed that distress ratings tended to be higher when assessed in a questionnaire than spontaneously reported, which may be due to the context of a questionnaire causing inflated ratings. Participants also reported SMCs which were not well assessed by the questionnaire, including some which were among the most distressing SMCs overall. Conversely, other SMCs were over-sampled by the questionnaire and did not feature in spontaneous reports. Conclusions: Implications for clinical assessment of SMCs are that open-ended questioning might be preferable to initial use of prescriptive questionnaires, in order to elicit SMCs that are most distressing. While use of questionnaires may reveal endorsement of a wider rangeABSTRACT: Background: Subjective memory complaints (SMCs) are a common occurrence for adults, which increase with age, and cause considerable distress. Traditionally SMCs have been assessed by either questionnaires, which ask whether a person has experienced given examples of SMCs, or open-ended questions which elicit spontaneous reports of SMCs. However, little is known about how these methods of assessment might influence reporting of SMCs. Methods: Four hundred and twenty one adults aged 40 years and above were surveyed about SMCs using spontaneous report and questionnaire methods. Results: As expected, spontaneously reported SMCs were fewer in number and rated more distressing overall than SMCs endorsed on a questionnaire. However, comparison of individual SMCs revealed that distress ratings tended to be higher when assessed in a questionnaire than spontaneously reported, which may be due to the context of a questionnaire causing inflated ratings. Participants also reported SMCs which were not well assessed by the questionnaire, including some which were among the most distressing SMCs overall. Conversely, other SMCs were over-sampled by the questionnaire and did not feature in spontaneous reports. Conclusions: Implications for clinical assessment of SMCs are that open-ended questioning might be preferable to initial use of prescriptive questionnaires, in order to elicit SMCs that are most distressing. While use of questionnaires may reveal endorsement of a wider range of SMCs than are spontaneously reported, they can take focus away from, or even fail to assess, those SMCs which cause most subjective distress (and therefore should be the target of interventions). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International psychogeriatrics. Volume 27:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- International psychogeriatrics
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0027-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 61
- Page End:
- 77
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-03
- Subjects:
- subjective memory complaints, -- aging, -- assessment, -- distress
Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals
618.9768905 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org ↗
http://titles.cambridge.org/journals/journal_catalogue.asp?mnemonic=ipg ↗
http://www.journals.cup.org/owadba/owa/issuesinjournal?jid=IPG ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/S1041610214001161 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1041-6102
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 2297.xml