Limitations of current risk assessment methods to foresee emerging risks: Towards a new methodology?. (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Escande, Jean; Proust, Christophe; Le Coze, Jean Christophe
• Is Part Of: Journal of loss prevention in the process industries. Volume 43(2016:Sep.)
• Page Start: 730
• Page End: 735
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Decision engineering -- Hazards identification -- Management and planning -- Safety; Chemical industries -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; 660.2804
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-4230

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work-in-progress is to investigate the potentialities but also the limitations of traditional risks analysis tools especially in the context of emerging technologies and develop a method facilitating the early detection of scenarios of accidents. This is certainly a challenge particularly for new industrial fields since, in this case, very little or no lesson from past accidents is available. It is believed that such situations cannot be conveniently treated using traditional risk assessment methods (HAZOP, FMEA, …) and typical examples are given. The reason is that those methods rely heavily on past accidents and are therefore "trapped" in them so that they are largely "inductive". In terms of foreseeing the future, the shortcomings of inductive methods are recalled. The possibility to imagine the future with very little clues is then discussed on the ground of theoretical consideration and a way to do so is proposed (abduction, serendipity). Then on the basis of the observation of how the experts work and how discoveries are made, a potential new methodology is outlined. Highlights: Examples of various situations where standard risk analysis failed. Examples of the successful identification of an unknown risk during a formatted risk analysis. Investigation of the way discoveries are made and of the links with the risk analysis exercise.