A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy. (17th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deveci, Serkan; Gotto, Geoffrey T.; Alex, Byron; O'Brien, Keith; Mulhall, John P.
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 118:Number 4(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 641
• Page End: 645
• Publication Date: 2016-01-17
• Subjects: sexual function -- radical prostatectomy -- expectations; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.13398
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To assess the understanding of patients, who had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), about their postoperative sexual function, as clinical experience suggests that some RP patients have unrealistic expectations about their long‐term sexual function. Patients and Methods: Patients presenting within 3 months of their open RP or robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were questioned about the sexual function information that they had received preoperatively. Patients were questioned about erectile function (EF), postoperative ejaculatory status, orgasm, and postoperative penile morphology changes. Statistical analyses were performed to assess for differences between patients who underwent open RP vs RALP. Results: In all, 336 consecutive patients (from nine surgeons) with a mean (SD) age of 64 (11) years had the survey instrument administered (216 underwent open RP and 120 underwent RALP). There were no significant differences in patient age or comorbidity profiles between the two groups. Only 38% of men had an accurate recollection of their nerve‐sparing status. The mean (SD) elapsed time after RP at the time of postoperative assessment was 3 (2) months. RALP patients expected a shorter EF recovery time (6 vs 12 months, P = 0.02), a higher likelihood of recovery back to baseline EF (75% vs 50%, P = 0.01), and a lower potential need for intracavernosal injection therapy (4% vs 20%, P = 0.01). Almost half of all patients were unaware that they were rendered anejaculatory by their surgery. None of the RALP patients and only 10% of open RP patients recalled being informed of the potential for penile length loss ( P < 0.01) and none were aware of the association between RP and Peyronie's disease. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone RP have largely unrealistic expectations about their postoperative sexual function.