Variation in the strength of lexical encoding across dialects. (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clopper, Cynthia G.; Tamati, Terrin N.; Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
• Is Part Of: Journal of phonetics. Volume 58(2016:Sep.)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 103
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Dialect variation -- Word recognition -- Recognition memory -- Lexical encoding; Phonetics -- Periodicals; Phonetics -- Periodicals; Phonétique -- Périodiques; Phonetics; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 414.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0095-4470

Abstract

Abstract: Lexical processing is slower and less accurate for unfamiliar dialects than familiar dialects. The goal of the current study was to test the hypothesis that dialect differences in lexical processing reflect differences in lexical encoding strength across dialects. Lexical encoding (i.e., updating the cognitive lexical representation to reflect the current token) was distinguished from lexical recognition (i.e., mapping the incoming acoustic signal to the target lexical category) in a series of lexical processing tasks with Midland and Northern American English. The experiments were conducted in the Midland region with Midland and Northern listeners. The results confirmed differential processing of the two dialects: the Midland dialect was processed more quickly than the Northern dialect. The results further revealed significantly larger repetition benefits (i.e., priming) and cross-dialect lexical interference effects for lexical forms in the Midland dialect than in the Northern dialect for both listener groups, particularly when the stimulus materials were presented in noise. These results suggest that lexical information is more strongly encoded for the contextually-local Midland dialect than for the non-local Northern dialect. We interpret these effects as reflecting cognitive processing costs associated with normalization for dialect variation, which lead to weaker lexical encoding under more difficult processing conditions. Highlights: Midland American English is processed more quickly than Northern American English. Larger repetition benefits (priming) are observed for the Midland dialect. Larger lexical interference effects are observed for the Midland dialect. Lexical information is more robustly encoded for the Midland dialect. Normalization costs for dialect variation lead to weaker lexical encoding.