Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery: A multicenter Analysis of 5202 Living Liver Donors. Issue 3 (September 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery: A multicenter Analysis of 5202 Living Liver Donors. Issue 3 (September 2016)
- Main Title:
- Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery
- Authors:
- Rössler, Fabian
Sapisochin, Gonzalo
Song, GiWon
Lin, Yu-Hung
Simpson, Mary Ann
Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
Laurenzi, Andrea
Sánchez Cabús, Santiago
Nunez, Milton Inostroza
Gatti, Andrea
Beltrame, Magali Chahdi
Slankamenac, Ksenija
Greig, Paul D.
Lee, Sung-Gyu
Chen, Chao-Long
Grant, David R.
Pomfret, Elizabeth A.
Kokudo, Norihiro
Cherqui, Daniel
Olthoff, Kim M.
Shaked, Abraham
García-Valdecasas, Juan Carlos
Lerut, Jan
Troisi, Roberto I.
De Santibanes, Martin
Petrowsky, Henrik
Puhan, Milo A.
Clavien, Pierre-Alain - Abstract:
- Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract : Objective: To measure and define the best achievable outcome after major hepatectomy. Background: No reference values are available on outcomes after major hepatectomies. Analysis in living liver donors, with safety as the highest priority, offers the opportunity to define outcome benchmarks as the best possible results. Methods: Outcome analyses of 5202 hemi-hepatectomies from living donors (LDs) from 12 high-volume centers worldwide were performed for a 10-year period. Endpoints, calculated at discharge, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, included postoperative morbidity measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and liver failure according to different definitions. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of median morbidity values to represent the best achievable results at 3 month postoperatively. Results: Patients were young (34 ± [9] years), predominantly male (65%) and healthy. Surgery lasted 7 ± [2] hours; 2% needed blood transfusions. Mean hospital stay was 11.7± [5] days. 12% of patients developed at least 1 complication, of which 3.8% were major events (≥grade III, including 1 death), mostly related to biliary/bleeding events, and were twice higher after right hepatectomy. The incidence of postoperative liver failure was low. Within 3-month follow-up, benchmark values for overall complication were ≤31 %, for minor/major complicationsAbstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract : Objective: To measure and define the best achievable outcome after major hepatectomy. Background: No reference values are available on outcomes after major hepatectomies. Analysis in living liver donors, with safety as the highest priority, offers the opportunity to define outcome benchmarks as the best possible results. Methods: Outcome analyses of 5202 hemi-hepatectomies from living donors (LDs) from 12 high-volume centers worldwide were performed for a 10-year period. Endpoints, calculated at discharge, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, included postoperative morbidity measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and liver failure according to different definitions. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of median morbidity values to represent the best achievable results at 3 month postoperatively. Results: Patients were young (34 ± [9] years), predominantly male (65%) and healthy. Surgery lasted 7 ± [2] hours; 2% needed blood transfusions. Mean hospital stay was 11.7± [5] days. 12% of patients developed at least 1 complication, of which 3.8% were major events (≥grade III, including 1 death), mostly related to biliary/bleeding events, and were twice higher after right hepatectomy. The incidence of postoperative liver failure was low. Within 3-month follow-up, benchmark values for overall complication were ≤31 %, for minor/major complications ≤23% and ≤9%, respectively, and a CCI ≤33 in LDs with complications. Centers having performed ≥100 hepatectomies had significantly lower rates for overall (10.2% vs 35.9%, P < 0.001) and major (3% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001) complications and overall CCI (2.1 vs 8.5, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The thorough outcome analysis of healthy LDs may serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance in patients undergoing major liver resection across centers and different patient populations. Further benchmark studies are needed to develop risk-adjusted comparisons of surgical outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 264:Issue 3(2016:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 264:Issue 3(2016:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 264, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 264
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0264-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 492
- Page End:
- 500
- Publication Date:
- 2016-09
- Subjects:
- Comprehensive Complication Index -- left hemi-hepatectomy -- living donor -- right hemi-hepatectomy
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1215.xml