Consistent modeling resolves asymmetry in stiffness matrices. (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hoevenaars, A.G.L.; Gosselin, C.; Lambert, P.; Herder, J.L.
• Is Part Of: Mechanism and machine theory. Volume 105(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 90
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: Parallel manipulators -- Stiffness analysis -- Loading -- Jacobian-derivative -- Asymmetry -- Screw theory; Machine theory -- Periodicals; Machinery -- Periodicals; Machines -- Périodiques; Génie mécanique -- Périodiques; Machine theory; Machinery; Periodicals; 621.81
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.06.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-114X

Abstract

Abstract: The Cartesian stiffness analysis of mechanisms and robotic manipulators is often performed using Jacobian-based stiffness analysis methods. In general it is necessary to consider the effect of loading, which introduces a Jacobian-derivative term. However, early examples of stiffness analyses of parallel manipulators in which the effect of loading was considered resulted in asymmetric stiffness matrices, which go against the definition of stiffness. By replicating those first analyses using an alternative formulation of the stiffness analysis, this paper finds that the earlier observed asymmetry can be explained as a modeling inconsistency. If that inconsistency is corrected, symmetric matrices are obtained, which supports the notion that the Jacobian-derivative term is an integral part of the stiffness analysis of parallel manipulators and mechanisms. Graphical Abstract: Highlights: The asymmetry in the stiffness matrices reported in Griffis and Duffy (1993) is explained. Asymmetry is explained by an inconsistent expression of the wrenches of actuation. Consistent modeling restores the symmetry in the stiffness matrices.