Altered recovery from inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in subjects with photosensitive epilepsy. Issue 10 (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bocci, Tommaso; Caleo, Matteo; Restani, Laura; Barloscio, Davide; Rossi, Simone; Sartucci, Ferdinando
• Is Part Of: Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 127:Issue 10(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 3353
• Page End: 3361
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Corpus callosum -- Visual system -- Photosensitivity -- Photo-paroxysmal response -- Long term depression; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.06.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-2457

Abstract

Highlights: We studied visual evoked potentials (VEPs) after inhibitory rTMS of visual cortex in photosensitive epilepsy (PSE). VEPs recovered faster in the stimulated hemisphere and disinhibition persisted in the contralateral one in PSE compared to controls. Persistent interhemispheric disinhibition in PSE may underlie the occurrence of photoparoxysmal responses. Abstract: Objective: To investigate functional changes underlying photosensitivity, we studied the response of the visual cortex to low-frequency, inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in drug-free patients with photosensitive seizures and healthy volunteers. Methods: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) triggered by grating stimuli of different contrasts were recorded in both hemispheres before and after transient functional inactivation of the occipital cortex of one side via low-frequency rTMS (0.5 Hz for 20′). VEPs were recorded before (T0), immediately after (T1) and 45′ following the completion of rTMS (T2). Results: Baseline amplitudes of the early VEP components (N1 and P1) were enhanced in photosensitive patients. At T1, rTMS produced an inhibitory effect on VEPs amplitudes at all contrasts in the targeted side and a concurrent facilitation of responses in the contralateral hemisphere. Compared with PSE subjects, VEP amplitudes remained persistently dampened in the stimulated hemisphere of controls (Holm–Sidak post-hoc method, p < 0.05). In the contralateral hemisphere, we found a clear enhancement of VEP amplitude in photosensitive subjects but not controls at T2 (Holm–Sidak test, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Visual responses recovered more quickly in the stimulated hemisphere, and disinhibition persisted in the contralateral side of photosensitive subjects. Significance: The rapid recovery of excitability and the persistent transcallosal disinhibition following perturbation of cortical activity may play a role in the pathophysiology of photosensitive epilepsy.