Outcome after fixation of metastatic proximal femoral fractures: A systematic review of 40 studies. Issue 4 (3rd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Janssen, Stein J.; Teunis, Teun; Hornicek, Francis J.; van Dijk, C. Niek; Bramer, Jos A.M.; Schwab, Joseph H.
• Is Part Of: Journal of surgical oncology. Volume 114:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 507
• Page End: 519
• Publication Date: 2016-07-03
• Subjects: pathological -- fracture -- cancer -- bone -- osseous; Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jso.24345
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4790

Abstract

Abstract : Endoprosthetic reconstruction, intramedullary nailing, and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) are the most commonly practiced surgical strategies for treatment of metastatic proximal femoral fractures. This review describes functional outcome, local, and systemic complications. All three surgical strategies result in reasonable function on average; however, wide ranges indicate that both poor and good functional levels are obtained. We found that the overall reoperation rate was comparable for endoprosthesis and intramedullary nailing, but was higher for ORIF. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:507–519 . © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.