Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. (1st October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salvi, Carola; Bricolo, Emanuela; Kounios, John; Bowden, Edward; Beeman, Mark
• Is Part Of: Thinking & reasoning. Volume 22:Number 4(2016)
• Page Start: 443
• Page End: 460
• Publication Date: 2016-10-01
• Subjects: Creativity -- insight -- problem solving; Thought and thinking -- Periodicals; Reasoning (Psychology) -- Periodicals; 153.43
• DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-6783

Abstract

ABSTRACT: How accurate are insights compared to analytical solutions? In four experiments, we investigated how participants' solving strategies influenced their solution accuracies across different types of problems, including one that was linguistic, one that was visual and two that were mixed visual-linguistic. In each experiment, participants' self-judged insight solutions were, on average, more accurate than their analytic ones. We hypothesised that insight solutions have superior accuracy because they emerge into consciousness in an all-or-nothing fashion when the unconscious solving process is complete, whereas analytic solutions can be guesses based on conscious, prematurely terminated, processing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that participants' analytic solutions included relatively more incorrect responses (i.e., errors of commission) than timeouts (i.e., errors of omission) compared to their insight responses.