Community‐Derived Standards for LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb Geochronology – Uncertainty Propagation, Age Interpretation and Data Reporting. Issue 3 (21st April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Horstwood, Matthew S. A.; Košler, Jan; Gehrels, George; Jackson, Simon E.; McLean, Noah M.; Paton, Chad; Pearson, Norman J.; Sircombe, Keith; Sylvester, Paul; Vermeesch, Pieter; Bowring, James F.; Condon, Daniel J.; Schoene, Blair
• Is Part Of: Geostandards and geoanalytical research. Volume 40:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 311
• Page End: 332
• Publication Date: 2016-04-21
• Subjects: laser ablation -- ICP‐MS -- U‐(Th‐)Pb geochronology -- uncertainty propagation -- data reporting; ablation laser -- ICP‐MS -- U‐(Th‐)Pb -- propagation des incertitudes -- la communication des données; Analytical geochemistry -- Periodicals; Géochimie analytique -- Périodiques; 551.9
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1639-4488

Abstract

Abstract : The LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb geochronology international community has defined new standards for the determination of U‐(Th‐)Pb ages. A new workflow defines the appropriate propagation of uncertainties for these data, identifying random and systematic components. Only data with uncertainties relating to random error should be used in weighted mean calculations of population ages; uncertainty components for systematic errors are propagated after this stage, preventing their erroneous reduction. Following this improved uncertainty propagation protocol, data can be compared at different uncertainty levels to better resolve age differences. New reference values for commonly used zircon, monazite and titanite reference materials are defined (based on ID‐TIMS) after removing corrections for common lead and the effects of excess 230 Th. These values more accurately reflect the material sampled during the determination of calibration factors by LA‐ICP‐MS analysis. Recommendations are made to graphically represent data only with uncertainty ellipses at 2 s and to submit or cite validation data with sample data when submitting data for publication. New data‐reporting standards are defined to help improve the peer‐review process. With these improvements, LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb data can be considered more robust, accurate, better documented and quantified, directly contributing to their improved scientific interpretation. Key points: New community‐derived LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb geochronology uncertainty propagation workflow defined, allowing better representation of absolute age uncertainties and better resolution of relative age differences within samples. New reference values defined for commonly used U‐Pb reference materials. New data‐reporting standards defined for more rigorous data presentation and peer review.