Evaluation of the use of adsorbent materials in the removal of nitrogen compounds from gas oil as a pre‐treatment for feeds for fluid catalytic cracking units. (20th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silva, Carlos F. P. M.; Davila, Luiz A.; Junior, Amaro G. B.; Figueiredo, Marcos A. G.; Souza, Wallace C.; Albuquerque, Flavio C.
• Is Part Of: Canadian journal of chemical engineering. Volume 94:Number 10(2016)
• Page Start: 1891
• Page End: 1900
• Publication Date: 2016-07-20
• Subjects: nitrogen removal -- gas oil -- heavy fuel; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals; 660.05
• DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22558
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-4034

Abstract

Abstract: This study was designed to investigate the use of commercial adsorbent materials for the removal of nitrogen compounds from a vacuum gas oil obtained from an industrial atmospheric distillation unit. Two types of adsorbents were tested: a clay developed specifically for the removal of nitrogen compounds from middle distillates (jet fuel and diesel); and a silica used in a variety of industries. Kinetic and thermodynamic equilibrium experiments were conducted at three temperatures: 80, 100, and 120 °C. The variation in the concentration of nitrogen and aromatic compounds was monitored throughout the kinetic adsorption and thermodynamic equilibrium experiments. When an adsorbent/gas oil mass ratio of 0.75 was used, the clay removed around 70 % of the basic nitrogen compounds from the gas oil, while the silica removed 80 % of the same compounds, which are the ones that effectively hamper catalytic cracking. The silica also removed 14.2 % of the aromatic compounds, while the clay only removed 4.1 %. This study shows that it is possible to treat a viscous hydrocarbon feed using an adsorption process to remove nitrogen compounds without the need to dilute the feed. Using a fluidized bed advanced cracking evaluation (ACE) unit, which simulates a fluid catalytic cracking unit on a bench scale, the gas oil treated with silica produced 3 % more liquid petroleum gas (LPG) and 4 % more gasoline, while the gas oil treated with clay produced 2 % more LPG and 3 % more gasoline than the untreated gas oil.