Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double‐blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. (12th May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double‐blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. (12th May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double‐blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens
- Authors:
- Senni, Michele
McMurray, John J.V.
Wachter, Rolf
McIntyre, Hugh F.
Reyes, Antonio
Majercak, Ivan
Andreka, Peter
Shehova‐Yankova, Nina
Anand, Inder
Yilmaz, Mehmet B.
Gogia, Harinder
Martinez‐Selles, Manuel
Fischer, Steffen
Zilahi, Zsolt
Cosmi, Franco
Gelev, Valeri
Galve, Enrique
Gómez‐Doblas, Juanjo J.
Nociar, Jan
Radomska, Maria
Sokolova, Beata
Volterrani, Maurizio
Sarkar, Arnab
Reimund, Bernard
Chen, Fabian
Charney, Alan - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: To assess the tolerability of initiating/uptitrating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) from 50 to 200 mg twice daily (target dose) over 3 and 6 weeks in heart failure (HF) patients (ejection fraction ≤35%). Methods and results: A 5‐day open‐label run‐in (sacubitril/valsartan 50 mg twice daily) preceded an 11‐week, double‐blind, randomization period [100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 200 mg twice daily ('condensed' regimen) vs. 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 200 mg twice daily ('conservative' regimen)]. Patients were stratified by pre‐study dose of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin‐receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; low‐dose stratum included ACEI/ARB‐naïve patients). Of 540 patients entering run‐in, 498 (92%) were randomized and 429 (86.1% of randomized) completed the study. Pre‐defined tolerability criteria were hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia; and adjudicated angioedema, which occurred in ('condensed' vs. 'conservative') 9.7% vs. 8.4% ( P = 0.570), 7.3% vs. 7.6% ( P = 0.990), 7.7% vs. 4.4% ( P = 0.114), and 0.0% vs. 0.8% of patients, respectively. Corresponding proportions for pre‐defined systolic blood pressure <95 mmHg, serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L, and serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL were 8.9% vs. 5.2% ( P = 0.102), 7.3% vs. 4.0% ( P = 0.097), and 0.4% vs. 0%, respectively. In total, 378 (76%) patients achieved and maintained sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily without doseAbstract: Aims: To assess the tolerability of initiating/uptitrating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) from 50 to 200 mg twice daily (target dose) over 3 and 6 weeks in heart failure (HF) patients (ejection fraction ≤35%). Methods and results: A 5‐day open‐label run‐in (sacubitril/valsartan 50 mg twice daily) preceded an 11‐week, double‐blind, randomization period [100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 200 mg twice daily ('condensed' regimen) vs. 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 200 mg twice daily ('conservative' regimen)]. Patients were stratified by pre‐study dose of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin‐receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; low‐dose stratum included ACEI/ARB‐naïve patients). Of 540 patients entering run‐in, 498 (92%) were randomized and 429 (86.1% of randomized) completed the study. Pre‐defined tolerability criteria were hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia; and adjudicated angioedema, which occurred in ('condensed' vs. 'conservative') 9.7% vs. 8.4% ( P = 0.570), 7.3% vs. 7.6% ( P = 0.990), 7.7% vs. 4.4% ( P = 0.114), and 0.0% vs. 0.8% of patients, respectively. Corresponding proportions for pre‐defined systolic blood pressure <95 mmHg, serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L, and serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL were 8.9% vs. 5.2% ( P = 0.102), 7.3% vs. 4.0% ( P = 0.097), and 0.4% vs. 0%, respectively. In total, 378 (76%) patients achieved and maintained sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily without dose interruption/down‐titration over 12 weeks (77.8% vs. 84.3% for 'condensed' vs. 'conservative'; P = 0.078). Rates by ACEI/ARB pre‐study dose stratification were 82.6% vs. 83.8% ( P = 0.783) for high‐dose/'condensed' vs. high‐dose/'conservative' and 84.9% vs. 73.6% ( P = 0.030) for low‐dose/'conservative' vs. low‐dose/'condensed'. Conclusions: Initiation/uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan from 50 to 200 mg twice daily over 3 or 6 weeks had a tolerability profile in line with other HF treatments. More gradual initiation/uptitration maximized attainment of target dose in the low‐dose ACEI/ARB group. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of heart failure. Volume 18:Number 9(2016)
- Journal:
- European journal of heart failure
- Issue:
- Volume 18:Number 9(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 18, Issue 9 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0018-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1193
- Page End:
- 1202
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05-12
- Subjects:
- LCZ696 -- Sacubitril -- Valsartan -- ARNI -- Heart failure -- Tolerability
Heart failure -- Periodicals
Heart Failure -- Periodicals
Insuffisance cardiaque -- Périodiques
Heart failure
Periodicals
616.129005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1879-0844 ↗
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/ejournals/issn/13889842/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13889842 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ejhf.548 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1388-9842
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.729860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2159.xml