Effects of item type and estimation method on the accuracy of estimated personality trait scores: Polytomous item response theory models versus summated scoring. (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Speer, Andrew B.; Robie, Chet; Christiansen, Neil D.
• Is Part Of: Personality and individual differences. Volume 102(2016)
• Page Start: 41
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: Item response theory -- Classical test theory -- Personality trait estimates; Personality -- Periodicals; Individuality -- Periodicals; Individuality -- Periodicals; Personality Development -- Periodicals; Personnalité -- Périodiques; Individualité -- Périodiques; 155.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-8869

Abstract

Abstract: Despite an increased use in item response theory (IRT)-based personality testing there is little research documenting whether trait estimations are actually improved over those derived via simply summated scoring according to classical test theory (CTT). In this study personality scale validity was compared using a variety of estimation methods (CTT, adjusted-CTT, SGR, GGUM) and item types (monotonic vs. non-monotonic) for the traits of conscientiousness and extraversion. Regardless of item type or estimation method, trait estimates were highly correlated. Using job performance ratings as an external criterion within the nomological network of these traits, model fit was not related to scale validity, and all estimation procedures resulted in comparable validity coefficients. Implications are discussed. Highlights: Effects of item type and estimation method on personality traits were examined. Trait estimates were highly correlated across item type and estimation method. Criterion-related validity did not differ by item type or estimation method. Personality researchers can continue to use classical test theory with confidence.