'Catching the waves' – slow cortical potentials as moderator of voluntary action. (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schmidt, Stefan; Jo, Han-Gue; Wittmann, Marc; Hinterberger, Thilo
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 68(2016)
• Page Start: 639
• Page End: 650
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Slow cortical potential -- Readiness potential -- Voluntary action -- Libet task -- Free will; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Ethology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques; Comportement humain -- Périodiques; Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Animal behavior; Human behavior; Neurology; Psychophysiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 573.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7634

Abstract

Highlights: The readiness potential (RP) is an ongoing negativity preceding voluntary action. So far the RP was interpreted as a preparatory signal for a self-initiated movement. New evidence can explain the RP also as consequence of prior slow cortical potentials (SCP). This evidence challenges the classical interpretation of experiments on free will. This new hypothesis is in agreement with prior research on SCPs and voluntary action. Abstract: The readiness potential is an ongoing negativity in the EEG preceding a self-initiated movement by approximately 1.5 s. So far it has predominantly been interpreted as a preparatory signal with a causal link to the upcoming movement. Here a different hypothesis is suggested which we call the selective slow cortical potential sampling hypothesis. In this review of recent research results we argue that the initiation of a voluntary action is more likely during negative fluctuations of the slow cortical potential and that the sampling and averaging of many trials leads to the observed negativity. That is, empirical evidence indicates that the early readiness potential is not a neural correlate of preconscious motor preparation and thus a determinant of action. Our hypothesis thereafter challenges the classic interpretation of the Libet experiment which is often taken as proof that there is no free will. We furthermore suggest that slow cortical potentials are related to an urge to act but are not a neural indicator of the decision process of action initiation.