Donor risk indices in pancreas allocation in the Eurotransplant region. (7th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kopp, Wouter H.; de Vries, Erwin; de Boer, Jan; Putter, Hein; Schareck, Wolfgang; Samuel, Undine; Braat, Andries E.
• Is Part Of: Transplant international. Volume 29:Number 8(2016)
• Page Start: 921
• Page End: 929
• Publication Date: 2016-07-07
• Subjects: donation -- donor identification -- expanded donor pool -- pancreas clinical -- selection criteria; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; 617.95405
• DOI: 10.1111/tri.12797
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0934-0874

Abstract

Summary: Pancreas donor selection and recognition are important to cope with increasing organ shortage. We aim to show that the PDRI is more useful than the P‐PASS to predict acceptance and should thus be preferred over P‐PASS. Eurotransplant donors from 2004 until 2014 were included in this study. PDRI logistical factors were set to reference to purely reflect donor quality (PDRIdonor ). PDRI and P‐PASS association with allocation outcome was studied using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Regional differences in donor quality were also investigated. Of the 10 444 pancreata that were reported, 6090 (58.3%) were accepted and 2947 (28.2%) were transplanted. We found that P‐PASS was inferior to PDRIdonor in its ability to predict organ reporting, acceptance, and transplantation: AUC 0.63, 0.67 and 0.73 for P‐PASS vs. 0.78, 0.79 and 0.84 for PDRIdonor, respectively. Furthermore, there were significant differences in donor quality among different Eurotransplant countries, both in reported donors and in transplanted organs. PDRI is a powerful predictor of allocation outcome and should be preferred over P‐PASS. Proper donor selection and recognition, and possibly a more liberal approach toward inferior quality donors, may increase donation and transplant rates.