Effect of stress ratio on fatigue lifetime of high Nb containing TiAl alloy at elevated temperature. (5th November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, Long; Song, Xiping; Zhang, Min; Jiao, Zehui; Yu, Huichen
• Is Part Of: Materials & design. Volume 84(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 378
• Page End: 384
• Publication Date: 2015-11-05
• Subjects: Titanium aluminide -- Fatigue lifetime -- Stress ratio -- Cyclic creep -- In situ observation; Materials -- Periodicals; Engineering design -- Periodicals; Matériaux -- Périodiques; Conception technique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-1275

Abstract

Abstract: The effect of stress ratio (R) on fatigue lifetime of a cast Ti–45Al–8.0Nb–0.2W–0.2B–0.1Y (at.%) alloy was investigated at 750 °C. Fatigue tests with various stress ratios ranging from 0.1 to 1 were performed using a mini servo-hydraulic fatigue machine inside a chamber of scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fatigue crack initiation and propagation behavior was studied by in situ SEM observation and fatigue fracture mode was examined by fracture surface analysis. It is found that fatigue lifetime shows a reversed S-type curve with the increase of stress ratio. At R ranging from 0.1 to 0.4, creep–fatigue interaction dominates the fatigue lifetime and the fatigue lifetime reaches its minimum value at R = 0.3. At R ranging from 0.4 to 1, creep damage dominates the fatigue lifetime and the fatigue lifetime exhibits inverse proportional relation with R. Meanwhile, with the increase of stress ratio, the fatigue crack initiation sites transform from lamellar interface at R = 0.1, to lamellar interface and colony boundary at R = 0.3, and to lamellar colony boundary at R = 0.5. Accordingly, the fatigue fracture mode transforms from transgranular cracking, to transgranular and intergranular cracking, and to intergranular cracking. Graphical abstract: Highlights: Fatigue life shows a reversed S-type curve with the increase of stress ratio. Creep–fatigue mechanism dominates at stress ratio ranging from 0.1 to 0.4. Creep mechanism dominates at stress ratio ranging from 0.4 to 1. Three fatigue fracture modes are observed.