The role of sediment structure in gas bubble storage and release. Issue 7 (28th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, L.; Wilkinson, J.; Koca, K.; Buchmann, C.; Lorke, A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 7(2016:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1992
• Page End: 2005
• Publication Date: 2016-07-28
• Subjects: sediment properties -- methane -- bubble formation -- ebullition; Geobiology -- Periodicals; Biogeochemistry -- Periodicals; Biotic communities -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 577.14
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JG003456
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-8953

Abstract

Abstract: Ebullition is an important pathway for methane emission from inland waters. However, the mechanisms controlling methane bubble formation and release in aquatic sediments remain unclear. A laboratory incubation experiment was conducted to investigate the dynamics of methane bubble formation, storage, and release in response to hydrostatic head drops in three different types of natural sediment. Homogenized clayey, silty, and sandy sediments (initially quasi‐uniform through the depth of the columns) were incubated in chambers for 3 weeks. We observed three distinct stages of methane bubble formation and release: stage I—microbubble formation‐displacing mobile water from sediment pores with negligible ebullition; stage II—formation of large bubbles, displacing the surrounding sediment with concurrent increase in ebullition; and stage III—formation of conduits with relatively steady ebullition. The maximum depth‐averaged volumetric gas content at steady state varied from 18.8% in clayey to 12.0% in silty and 13.2% in sandy sediment. Gas storage in the sediment columns showed strong vertical stratification: most of the free gas was stored in an upper layer, whose thickness varied with sediment grain size. The magnitude of individual ebullition episodes was linearly correlated to hydrostatic head drop and decreased from clayey to sandy to silty sediment and was in excess of that estimated from gas expansion alone, indicating the release of pore water methane. These findings combined with a hydrodynamic model capable of determining dominant sediment type and depositional zones could help resolve spatial heterogeneities in methane ebullition at medium to larger scales in inland waters. Key Points: Gas storage capacity in aquatic sediments is affected by sediment grain size distribution A gas‐enriched upper layer with varying thickness is formed in different types of homogenous sediment Ebullition responds linearly to hydrostatic head drop, and release potential is determined by gas storage capacity