Dynamic transformation of deformed austenite at temperatures above the Ae3. (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghosh, Chiradeep; Aranas, Clodualdo; Jonas, John J.
• Is Part Of: Progress in materials science. Volume 82(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 151
• Page End: 233
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Hot rolling -- Rolling load -- Interpass time -- Mean flow stress -- Dynamic transformation -- Dynamic recrystallization -- Critical strain -- Double derivative method -- Torsion testing -- Work hardening -- Ae3 -- Phase transformation -- EBSD -- Widmanstätten ferrite -- Thermodynamics -- Dislocation density -- Carbon diffusion -- Gibbs energy -- Mechanical activation -- Transformation softening; Materials science -- Periodicals; Science des matériaux -- Périodiques; 620.1105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.04.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0079-6425

Abstract

Abstract: The dynamic transformation of austenite to ferrite at temperatures above the Ae3 temperature was first investigated by Yada and co-workers in the late 1980s. This phenomenon has now been observed right up to the delta ferrite formation temperature. The basic principles of dynamic transformation are reviewed, together with recent advances in the understanding of this mechanism. The transformation product that forms has been identified as Widmanstätten ferrite, which nucleates displacively and whose growth is accompanied by carbon diffusion. It forms in pairs of self-accommodating plates of near-identical orientation. The similar orientations of the plates allow them to coalesce on continued straining or holding at temperature, leading to the presence of polygonal grains as well as plates. The critical strain for the initiation of dynamic transformation is usually detected using double differentiation; results obtained by researchers on different steels are reviewed, together with observations obtained during the torsion simulation of strip and plate rolling. The thermodynamics of dynamic transformation are examined in detail, with attention paid to three recent approaches, the: (i) stored energy, (ii) stress activation, and (iii) phase softening models. It is concluded that the phase softening model provides the most accurate description of the transformation of the models proposed recently.