Diverging Paths? A Comparative Look at Childcare Policies in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. (7th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: An, Mi Young; Peng, Ito
• Is Part Of: Social policy & administration. Volume 50:Number 5(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 540
• Page End: 558
• Publication Date: 2015-04-07
• Subjects: Childcare -- Fuzzy set ideal type analysis -- Japan -- South Korea -- Taiwan; Social policy -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Periodicals; 361.6105
• DOI: 10.1111/spol.12128
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5596

Abstract

Abstract: This article compares state policies to support childcare in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, using fuzzy set ideal type analysis to determine the nature of institutional arrangements with respect to labour, money and time provisions. We then note their implications for familialization and defamilialization in the three countries. Our analysis suggests a common pattern towards the increased use of financial support amongst the three countries over time; however, this commonality does not mean their childcare policies are converging, as the financial supports differ in focus, with Japan concentrating on familialization by valuing family care, and Korea exclusively employing policy to facilitate the use of market‐based care services. For its part, Taiwan has been strengthening familialization by increasing the leave compensation to value time off to provide care. The different labour, money and time dimensions vis‐à‐vis the familialization/defamilialization matrix suggest varying implications of institutional arrangements for gender.