A Case Study of Ecosystem Services in Urban Planning in Finland: Benefits, Rights and Responsibilities. Issue 3 (26th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rinne, Janne; Primmer, Eeva
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental policy and planning. Volume 18:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 286
• Page End: 305
• Publication Date: 2016-05-26
• Subjects: Ecosystem services -- urban planning -- land-use planning -- institutions -- Finland; Environmental policy -- Europe -- Periodicals; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1076721
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-908X

Abstract

Abstract: The concept of ecosystem services is entering the agenda of land-use planning and scientists optimistically expect it to inform planners and decision-makers about the benefits that ecosystems provide. While tools and methods have been developed for mapping and valuing ecosystem services, only little attention has been paid to the practical application of the approach or its institutional preconditions and implications. We empirically analysed two urban planning processes for building residential areas in the outskirts of growing population centres in Finland. Our analysis of documents and interviews with planners focused on the benefits provided by ecosystems as well as the associated rights and responsibilities. We found that the concept 'ecosystem service' was not used, yet various benefits were identified. The rights of different stakeholders to ecosystem services were not explicitly identified, but many ecosystem services were perceived as public goods and particularly access to recreation was highlighted as an important justification for green areas. The results show that while the ecosystem services approach introduces new insights to land-use planning, it is still not embedded in the current practices or institutions. Operationalizing ecosystem services requires institutional adaptation, case-specific tailoring of methods, and deliberation among practitioners and stakeholders.