Timing for dose-down of 5-ASA depends on mucosal status with ulcerative colitis. (2nd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takahashi, Fumiaki; Tominaga, Keiichi; Kanamori, Akira; Takenaka, Kazuhiro; Hoshino, Atsushi; Sugaya, Takeshi; Nakano, Masakazu; Hiraishi, Hideyuki
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Volume 51:Number 7(2016)
• Page Start: 827
• Page End: 834
• Publication Date: 2016-07-02
• Subjects: Aminosalicylic acid -- clinical remission -- endoscopic healing -- ulcerative colitis; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1141315
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0036-5521

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Although aminosalicylic acid (ASA) preparations have been used as first-line drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), no consistent view has been established regarding the ASA dose during the remission-maintenance phase of the disease. In this study, we examined whether the ASA dose should be reduced during the remission-maintenance phase. Materials and methods: This study included 203 patients in the remission-maintenance phase of UC. The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) was used to evaluate mucosa. Comparison and analysis were performed between patients whose ASA dose had been unchanged and whose dose had been reduced, between patients with endoscopic healing (EH) group and those without endoscopic healing (WEH) group, and between patients with an MES of 0 and 1. Results: Comparison between the unchanged-ASA and reduced-ASA groups revealed that the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the unchanged-ASA group ( p < 0.001). Next, the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the EH/unchanged-ASA group than in the EH/reduced-ASA group ( p = 0.042). Comparison between the MES 0 and 1 groups revealed that the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the MES 0 group ( p = 0.007). In addition, no significant difference in remission-maintenance rates was observed between the MES 0/unchanged-ASA group and the MES 0/reduced-ASA group ( p = 0.108). Conclusion: When the same ASA dose is maintained regardless of the presence or absence of EH, remission is more likely to be maintained. If the ASA dose must be reduced, dose reduction is more advantageous after an MES of 0 is achieved.