Simulations of an observed elevated mesoscale convective system over southern England during CSIP IOP 3. (28th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: White, B. A.; Blyth, A. M.; Marsham, J. H.
• Is Part Of: Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Volume 142:Number 698(2016)
• Page Start: 1929
• Page End: 1947
• Publication Date: 2016-04-28
• Subjects: MCS -- elevated convection -- WRF -- Convective Storm Initiation Project -- rear‐inflow jet -- cloud microphysics -- cold pool; Meteorology -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/qj.2787
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-9009

Abstract

Abstract : Simulations of an elevated mesoscale convective system (MCS) observed over southern England during the Convective Storm Initiation Project (CSIP) provide the first detailed modelling study of a case of elevated convection occurring in the UK. The study shows that many factors can influence the maintenance of elevated deep convection, from large‐scale flow through to surface heating processes and diabatic cooling within the convective system. It is also shown that interactions and feedback mechanisms between a stable layer and the storm can act to maintain deep convection. The simulation successfully reproduced an elevated MCS above a low‐level stable undercurrent, with a wave in the undercurrent linked to a rear‐inflow jet (RIJ). Convection was fed from an elevated (840 hPa) source layer with CAPE of about 350 J kg −1 . The undercurrent in the simulation was approximately 1 km deep, about half that observed. Unlike the observed MCS, a transition from elevated to surface‐based convection occurred in the simulation due to the combined effects of a pre‐existing large‐scale θ e gradient, advection and surface heating causing the system to encounter increasingly unstable low‐level air and a shallower stable layer that was more susceptible to penetration by downdraughts. The transition to surface‐based convection was accompanied by the development of cold‐pool outflow and an increase in system velocity from about 6 to 10 m s −1 . Diabatic cooling from microphysical processes in the simulation enhanced the undercurrent and strengthened the RIJ. This strengthened the wave in the undercurrent and led to more extensive convection. The existence of a positive feedback process between the convection, RIJ and stable layer is discussed. Uncertainty in the synoptic scale generating errors in the undercurrent is shown to be a major source of error for convective‐scale forecasts.