Use of p16 FISH for differential diagnosis of mesothelioma in smear preparations. Issue 9 (24th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nabeshima, Kazuki; Matsumoto, Shinji; Hamasaki, Makoto; Hida, Tomoyuki; Kamei, Toshiaki; Hiroshima, Kenzo; Tsujimura, Tohru; Kawahara, Kunimitsu
• Is Part Of: Diagnostic cytopathology. Volume 44:Issue 9(2016)
• Page Start: 774
• Page End: 780
• Publication Date: 2016-05-24
• Subjects: malignant pleural mesothelioma -- p16 gene -- fluorescence in situ hybridization -- homozygous deletion -- cytologic diagnosis -- ancillary techniques; Cytodiagnosis -- Periodicals; Pathology, Cellular -- Periodicals; Cytology -- Periodicals; 616.07582
• DOI: 10.1002/dc.23501
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8755-1039

Abstract

Abstract : Because most of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients first present with pleural effusion, detection of mesothelioma cells on effusion smears is critical for early diagnosis. Recently, accumulating evidence indicating that the cytological diagnosis of MPM supported by ancillary techniques is as reliable as that based on histopathology has led to new guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of MPM. Based on the guidelines, a combination of cytomorphological criteria and verification by ancillary techniques is required for the cytologic diagnosis of MPM. Detection of p16 homozygous deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most reliable ancillary technique for differentiating MPM from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC) because of its relatively high sensitivity and extremely high specificity. We showed that the p16 deletion status of MPM cells in pleural effusions reflected that of the underlying invasive MPM tissues, indicating the usefulness of p16 FISH in effusion smear cytology for MPM diagnosis. Thus, for differentiating MPM from RMC, we propose to perform p16 FISH as often as possible. A positive p16 homozygous deletion supports the diagnosis of MPM. However, a negative result does not rule out the possibility of MPM. In such cases, a morphological assessment is critical. Therefore, we analyzed the morphological characteristics of p16 deletion‐positive mesothelioma cells using a combination of virtual microscopy and p16 FISH, and identified three morphological characteristics useful for the differentiation, including cell‐in‐cell engulfment with or without hump formation, multinucleate cells, and larger berry‐like cell aggregates. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:774–780. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.