New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection. (3rd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhu, Mark; Ravi, Saiprasad; Frampton, Chris; Luey, Chris; Young, Simon
• Is Part Of: Acta orthopaedica. Volume 87:Number 4(2016)
• Page Start: 346
• Page End: 350
• Publication Date: 2016-07-03
• Subjects: Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1171639
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-3674

Abstract

Abstract : Background and purpose — Recent studies have revealed deficiencies in the accuracy of data from joint registries when reoperations for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are reported, particularly when no components are changed. We compared the accuracy of data from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) to a multicenter audit of hospital records to establish the rate of capture for PJI reoperations. Methods — 4, 009 cases undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty performed at 3 tertiary referral hospitals over a 3-year period were audited using multiple hospital datasets and the NZJR. The number of reoperations for PJI that were performed within 2 years of the primary arthroplasty was obtained using both methods and the data were compared. Results — The NZJR reported a 2-year reoperation rate for PJI of 0.67%, as compared to 1.1% from the audit of hospital records, giving the NZJR a sensitivity of 63%. Only 4 of 11 debridement-in-situ-only procedures and 7 of 12 modular exchange procedures were captured in the NZJR. Interpretation — The national joint registry underestimated the rate of reoperation for PJI by one third. Strategies for improving the accuracy of data might include revising and clarifying the registry forms to include all reoperations for PJI and frequent validation of the registry data against other databases.