An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope. Issue 6 (15th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Durand, M.; Gleason, C. J.; Garambois, P. A.; Bjerklie, D.; Smith, L. C.; Roux, H.; Rodriguez, E.; Bates, P. D.; Pavelsky, T. M.; Monnier, J.; Chen, X.; Di Baldassarre, G.; Fiset, J.‐M.; Flipo, N.; Frasson, R. P. d. M.; Fulton, J.; Goutal, N.; Hossain, F.; Humphries, E.; Minear, J. T.; Mukolwe, M. M.; Neal, J. C.; Ricci, S.; Sanders, B. F.; Schumann, G.; Schubert, J. E.; Vilmin, L.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 52:Issue 6(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 4527
• Page End: 4549
• Publication Date: 2016-06-15
• Subjects: discharge algorithms -- remote sensing of rivers -- SWOT; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018434
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission planned for launch in 2020 will map river elevations and inundated area globally for rivers >100 m wide. In advance of this launch, we here evaluated the possibility of estimating discharge in ungauged rivers using synthetic, daily "remote sensing" measurements derived from hydraulic models corrupted with minimal observational errors. Five discharge algorithms were evaluated, as well as the median of the five, for 19 rivers spanning a range of hydraulic and geomorphic conditions. Reliance upon a priori information, and thus applicability to truly ungauged reaches, varied among algorithms: one algorithm employed only global limits on velocity and depth, while the other algorithms relied on globally available prior estimates of discharge. We found at least one algorithm able to estimate instantaneous discharge to within 35% relative root‐mean‐squared error (RRMSE) on 14/16 nonbraided rivers despite out‐of‐bank flows, multichannel planforms, and backwater effects. Moreover, we found RRMSE was often dominated by bias; the median standard deviation of relative residuals across the 16 nonbraided rivers was only 12.5%. SWOT discharge algorithm progress is therefore encouraging, yet future efforts should consider incorporating ancillary data or multialgorithm synergy to improve results. Key Points: SWOT discharge algorithms were tested on synthetic observations for 19 rivers Algorithms accurately characterized temporal dynamics of river discharge At least one algorithm estimated discharge to <35% relative RMSE on 14/16 of nonbraided rivers