Combined use of thermal methods and seepage meters to efficiently locate, quantify, and monitor focused groundwater discharge to a sand‐bed stream. Issue 6 (12th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rosenberry, Donald O.; Briggs, Martin A.; Delin, Geoffrey; Hare, Danielle K.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 52:Issue 6(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 4486
• Page End: 4503
• Publication Date: 2016-06-12
• Subjects: seepage -- groundwater discharge -- heterogeneity; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2016WR018808
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: Quantifying flow of groundwater through streambeds often is difficult due to the complexity of aquifer‐scale heterogeneity combined with local‐scale hyporheic exchange. We used fiber‐optic distributed temperature sensing (FO‐DTS), seepage meters, and vertical temperature profiling to locate, quantify, and monitor areas of focused groundwater discharge in a geomorphically simple sand‐bed stream. This combined approach allowed us to rapidly focus efforts at locations where prodigious amounts of groundwater discharged to the Quashnet River on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, northeastern USA. FO‐DTS detected numerous anomalously cold reaches one to several m long that persisted over two summers. Seepage meters positioned upstream, within, and downstream of 7 anomalously cold reaches indicated that rapid groundwater discharge occurred precisely where the bed was cold; median upward seepage was nearly 5 times faster than seepage measured in streambed areas not identified as cold. Vertical temperature profilers deployed next to 8 seepage meters provided diurnal‐signal‐based seepage estimates that compared remarkably well with seepage‐meter values. Regression slope and R 2 values both were near 1 for seepage ranging from 0.05 to 3.0 m d −1 . Temperature‐based seepage model accuracy was improved with thermal diffusivity determined locally from diurnal signals. Similar calculations provided values for streambed sediment scour and deposition at subdaily resolution. Seepage was strongly heterogeneous even along a sand‐bed river that flows over a relatively uniform sand and fine‐gravel aquifer. FO‐DTS was an efficient method for detecting areas of rapid groundwater discharge, even in a strongly gaining river, that can then be quantified over time with inexpensive streambed thermal methods. Key Points: Seepage can be highly focused even in a strongly gaining sand‐bed stream Seepage occurs directly at cold anomalies in FO‐DTS data Combined use of FO‐DTS, seepage meters, and profilers effectively locates, quantifies, and records seepage variability