Applying Dynamic Training‐Subset Selection Methods Using Genetic Programming for Forecasting Implied Volatility. (3rd December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hamida, Sana Ben; Abdelmalek, Wafa; Abid, Fathi
• Is Part Of: Computational intelligence. Volume 32:Number 3(2016)
• Page Start: 369
• Page End: 390
• Publication Date: 2014-12-03
• Subjects: genetic programming, implied volatility forecast, static training‐subset selection, dynamic training‐subset selection, mean squared errors, percentage of non‐fitted observations; Artificial intelligence -- Periodicals; Computational linguistics -- Periodicals; 006.3
• DOI: 10.1111/coin.12057
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0824-7935

Abstract

Abstract : Volatility is a key variable in option pricing, trading, and hedging strategies. The purpose of this article is to improve the accuracy of forecasting implied volatility using an extension of genetic programming (GP) by means of dynamic training‐subset selection methods. These methods manipulate the training data in order to improve the out‐of‐sample patterns fitting. When applied with the static subset selection method using a single training data sample, GP could generate forecasting models, which are not adapted to some out‐of‐sample fitness cases. In order to improve the predictive accuracy of generated GP patterns, dynamic subset selection methods are introduced to the GP algorithm allowing a regular change of the training sample during evolution. Four dynamic training‐subset selection methods are proposed based on random, sequential, or adaptive subset selection. The latest approach uses an adaptive subset weight measuring the sample difficulty according to the fitness cases' errors. Using real data from S&P500 index options, these techniques are compared with the static subset selection method. Based on mean squared error total and percentage of non‐fitted observations, results show that the dynamic approach improves the forecasting performance of the generated GP models, especially those obtained from the adaptive‐random training‐subset selection method applied to the whole set of training samples.