'Talk to me': a mixed methods study on preferred physician behaviours during end‐of‐life communication from the patient perspective. (14th July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdul‐Razzak, Amane; Sherifali, Diana; You, John; Simon, Jessica; Brazil, Kevin
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 19:Number 4(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 883
• Page End: 896
• Publication Date: 2015-07-14
• Subjects: advance care planning -- end‐of‐life communication -- mixed methods -- patient preference -- physician–patient relations; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.12384
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Despite the recognized importance of end‐of‐life (EOL) communication between patients and physicians, the extent and quality of such communication is lacking. Objective: We sought to understand patient perspectives on physician behaviours during EOL communication. Design: In this mixed methods study, we conducted quantitative and qualitative strands and then merged data sets during a mixed methods analysis phase. In the quantitative strand, we used the quality of communication tool (QOC) to measure physician behaviours that predict global rating of satisfaction in EOL communication skills, while in the qualitative strand we conducted semi‐structured interviews. During the mixed methods analysis, we compared and contrasted qualitative and quantitative data. Setting and Participants: Seriously ill inpatients at three tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Results: We found convergence between qualitative and quantitative strands: patients desire candid information from their physician and a sense of familiarity. The quantitative results ( n = 132) suggest a paucity of certain EOL communication behaviours in this seriously ill population with a limited prognosis. The qualitative findings ( n = 16) suggest that at times, physicians did not engage in EOL communication despite patient readiness, while sometimes this may represent an appropriate deferral after assessment of a patient's lack of readiness. Conclusions: Avoidance of certain EOL topics may not always be a failure if it is a result of an assessment of lack of patient readiness. This has implications for future tool development: a measure could be built in to assess whether physician behaviours align with patient readiness.