Percentage of hypochromic erythrocytes and reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent predictors of response to intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients. (10th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Urrechaga, E.; Boveda, O.; Aguayo, F. J.; de la Hera, P.; Muñoz, R. I.; Gallardo, I.; Escanero, J. F.
• Is Part Of: International journal of laboratory hematology. Volume 38:Number 4(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 360
• Page End: 365
• Publication Date: 2016-05-10
• Subjects: Iron availability -- hemodialysis -- reticulocyte hemoglobin content -- hypochromic erythrocytes -- Erythropoiesis; Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12496
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-5521

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: Reticulocyte hemoglobin content and percentage of hypochromic red cells are incorporated into the European best practice guidelines on anemia management in chronic kidney disease. Sysmex XN analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) reports reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (Ret‐He) and the hypochromic fraction of erythrocytes (%Hypo‐He). Our aim was to assess the value of these parameters, in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for detecting functional iron deficiency, in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Methods: Forty HD patients in the maintenance phase of erythropoietin therapy were included. Intravenous iron supplementation was interrupted at least 3 weeks before recruitment. Two samples were analyzed for each patient: the baseline after the iron‐free period and the second sample after 4 weeks of IV iron administration. Hemogram and biochemical parameters of the iron status were measured. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders to an iron load; responders had an increase in Hb of at least 10 g/L after iron administration, compared to the baseline. To identify the efficiency of the test for predicting the response to iron administration, receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) was performed. Results: According to the established criteria, 21 patients were responders and 19 nonresponders. ROC analysis results: Ret‐He area under curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.64–0.93), at cutoff 30.8 pg, sensitivity 78.7%, and specificity 87.2%. % Hypo‐He AUC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.64–0.91), at cutoff 2.4%, sensitivity 72.2%, and specificity 88.1%. Conclusions: % Hypo‐He and Ret‐He are reliable parameters for the study of erythropoiesis status in HD patients.