Effects of home and education environments on children's motor performance in China. (19th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hua, Jing; Duan, Tao; Gu, Guixiong; Wo, Da; Zhu, Qinqin; Liu, Jiang‐Qin; Liu, Ming; Wu, Zhuochun; Meng, Wei
• Is Part Of: Developmental medicine & child neurology. Volume 58:Number 8(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 868
• Page End: 876
• Publication Date: 2016-02-19
• Subjects: Child development -- Periodicals; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13073
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-1622

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of home and educational environments on children's motor performance in China. Method: We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 4001 preschool children selected from 160 classes. The children's motor performance was assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (MABC‐2). Home and educational environments were evaluated using validated checklists. The effects of home and educational environments on motor performance were analysed using mixed and multilevel logistic regression models. Results: The results showed that one score increase in the outside space of the family home was positively associated with the increase in total test score (0.104) subtest score of aiming and catching (0.037), and balance (0.034) of the MABC‐2, after adjusting for potential confounders (each p <0.05). Possession of motor toys at home and parental rearing behaviours were also related to total test score, manual dexterity, and balance ( β =0.022–0.104, each p <0.05). Space and furnishings, activity, and interaction in the classroom had a significant positive association with total test score ( β =0.069–0.201), and with subtest scores of manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance respectively ( β =0.115–0.206). Space and furnishings of classrooms and possession of toys in the household were protective factors for 'at risk' or significant poor performance (odds ratio 0.942–0.973, each p <0.05). Interpretation: A permissive and accepting family and educational environment made a positive contribution to children's motor performance. Access to sufficient space and furnishings within the classroom, as well as toys in the family, were protective factors for poor motor performance. Future assistance is needed to support an advantageous environment in early childhood programmes in China. What this paper adds: An advantageous home and family environment has a positive influence on motor performance. Appropriate preschool environments are protective factors for poor performance. Future assistance for developing advantageous motor environment is needed in China. This article is commented on by Van Waelvelde and Miyahara on pages795–796 of this issue.