Clinical and Radiological Long‐Term Outcome of a Tapered Implant System with Special Emphasis on the Influence of Augmentation Procedures. (25th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schiegnitz, Eik; Al‐Nawas, Bilal; Tegner, Alexander; Sagheb, Keyvan; Berres, Manfred; Kämmerer, Peer W; Wagner, Wilfried
• Is Part Of: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Volume 18:Number 4(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 810
• Page End: 820
• Publication Date: 2015-03-25
• Subjects: alveolar ridge reconstruction -- bone augmentation -- crestal bone loss -- long‐term survival -- sinus augmentation -- tapered implants; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dental Implantation -- Periodicals; Dental Implants -- Periodicals; 617.693
• DOI: 10.1111/cid.12338
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-0899

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Purpose: Tapered implant designs aim to improve primary stability and implant survival in soft bone. However, respective clinical long‐term data are scarce. Therefore, a clinical and radiological evaluation of the long‐term success of a transgingival‐supracrestal inserted tapered implant system with special emphasis on the influence of augmentation procedures was conducted. Material and Methods: In a retrospective study design, all in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany, between May 2002 and March 2012, placed tapered implants (Straumann TE®, Basel, Switzerland) were analyzed. In this time period, a total of one hundred ninety‐seven tapered implants were inserted in 90 patients. For patients available for clinical recall, success criteria according to Albrektsson and Buser were evaluated. Results: The in situ rate was 96.3% after an average time in situ of 62 ± 31 months. In one hundred twenty‐seven sites, bone augmentation procedures were performed. Hereof, 96 sites were sinus augmentation procedures and 31 sites were alveolar ridge augmentations. For patients with sinus augmentation procedures, implant survival was 97.9% and for patients with alveolar ridge augmentations, implant survival was 93.5% after 5 years, indicating a higher implant survival for sinus augmentation, however not statistically different ( p = .194). Implant diameter and timing of implant placement had no significant impact on implant survival ( p > .05). Mean marginal bone loss was −0.50 ± 1.54 mm for patients receiving maxillary sinus augmentation and −1.16 ± 1.13 mm for patients with alveolar ridge augmentations, indicating a lower marginal bone loss in patients receiving maxillary sinus augmentation ( p = .046). Implant success rates ranged between 88% and 92% after a mean follow‐up of 6 years. Conclusions: Within the limits of the retrospective character of this study, the tapered soft tissue level implant showed especially in maxillary sinus augmentation promising long‐term survival and success rates and a low peri‐implant bone resorption compared with the literature.