Electrostatic interactions are important for the distribution of Gd(DTPA)2− in articular cartilage. Issue 2 (2nd September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Algotsson, Jenny; Forsman, Jan; Topgaard, Daniel; Söderman, Olle
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 76:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 500
• Page End: 509
• Publication Date: 2015-09-02
• Subjects: cartilage -- fixed charge density -- delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage -- μMRI -- Monte Carlo simulations; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25889
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) method can be used to assess the content of glycosaminoglycan in cartilage. In in vitro and model studies, the content of glycosaminoglycan is often expressed in terms of a fixed charge density (FCD). Values of the fixed charge density obtained using the dGEMRIC method differs from values obtained using other methods. The purpose of this work was to further clarify the origin of this discrepancy. Methods: dGEMRIC experiments were performed in a μMRI setup on a custom‐designed, well‐defined model system capturing the relevant ionic features of cartilage. The model system allows for good control over and systematic variation of relevant parameters. The experimental data was compared with results from Monte Carlo simulations on a coarse‐grained model. Results: Application of ideal Donnan theory on data obtained from experiments as well as simulations lead to underestimation of the fixed charge density, in agreement with previous studies. Conclusion: To obtain more accurate estimates of the fixed charge density using the dGEMRIC method, interionic interactions need to be taken into account in the Donnan analysis. Furthermore, the results suggest that the combination of μMRI dGEMRIC experiments and Monte Carlo simulations are useful tools for an improved understanding of these effects. Magn Reson Med 76:500–509, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.