Maternal exposure to radiographic exams and major structural birth defects. Issue 7 (22nd March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lim, Hyeyeun; Beasley, Charles W.; Whitehead, Lawrence W.; Emery, Robert J.; Agopian, A.J.; Langlois, Peter H.; Waller, Dorothy K.
• Is Part Of: Birth defects research. Volume 106:Issue 7(2016)
• Page Start: 563
• Page End: 572
• Publication Date: 2016-03-22
• Subjects: birth defects -- isolated d‐transposition of the great arteries -- radiography; Teratology -- Periodicals; Abnormalities, Human -- Research -- Periodicals; Abnormalities, Human -- Periodicals; 616.043
• DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23496
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1542-0752

Abstract

Abstract : Background: An increasing number of radiologic exams are performed in the United States, but very few studies have examined the effects of maternal exposure to radiologic exams during the periconceptional period and birth defects. Objectives: To assess the association between maternal exposure to radiologic exams during the periconceptional period and 19 categories of birth defects using a large population‐based study of birth defects. Methods: We studied 27, 809 case mothers and 10, 200 control mothers who participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and delivered between 1997 and 2009. Maternal exposure to radiologic exams that delivered ionizing radiation to the urinary tract, lumbar spine, abdomen, or pelvis were identified based on the mother's report of type of radiologic exams, organ or body part scanned and the month during which the exam occurred Results: Overall, 0.9% of mothers reported exposure to one of these types of radiographic exams during the periconceptional period. We observed significant associations between maternal exposure during the first trimester and isolated Dandy‐Walker malformation (odds ratio = 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–33) and isolated d‐transposition of the great arteries (odds ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–10.3). However, the result for isolated Dandy‐Walker malformation was based on only two exposed cases. Conclusion: These results should be interpreted cautiously because multiple statistical tests were conducted and measurements of exposure were based on maternal report. However, our results may be useful for generating hypotheses for future studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:563–572, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.