Towards an evolutionary or a transformational energy transition? Transition concepts and roadmaps in European Union policy discourse. Issue 3 (2nd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Szarka, Joseph
• Is Part Of: Innovation. Volume 29:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 222
• Page End: 242
• Publication Date: 2016-07-02
• Subjects: energy transition -- energy policy -- European Union -- European Commission; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 300.5
• DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1166039
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-1610

Abstract

Abstract : To develop a new typology of energy transitions, the article firstly clarifies the ambiguities in the transition debate and establishes fault lines that divide rival conceptualizations of energy transitions. The main fault lines relate to a product versus a process emphasis, a deterministic versus an open-ended perspective, and near-term versus long-term orientations. Two "ideal type" positionings towards energy transition(s) are developed. An evolutionary variety is based on incremental energy transitions over the long term which combine "old" and "new" energy sources and providers, whereas a transformational variety recommends a "grand transition" based on a near-term switch to 100% renewables. In its second section, the article uses this twofold typology to investigate transition thinking in the energy policy discourse of the European Commission. A key finding is that the Commission's policy documents indicate a leaning towards evolutionary transitions, with reliance on conventional energy sources set to continue for some time. Several explanations for this leaning are identified: a shortage of political will, finite available means, limits to knowledge, as well as institutional incapacity. An additional finding is that tensions in energy policy formulation emerging from the EU's multilevel system of governance are leading to a clash between pioneer member states aiming for an ambitious energy transition and the Commission's more modest orientations. In consequence, an analytical typology exploring conflict between rival conceptualizations of energy transitions will be relevant for the future.