Evaluating the interface of health data and policy: Applications of geospatial analysis to county-level national data. Issue 3 (2nd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hollar, David W.
• Is Part Of: Children's health care. Volume 45:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 266
• Page End: 285
• Publication Date: 2016-07-02
• Subjects: Children -- Hospital care -- Periodicals; Child health services -- Periodicals; Children -- Preparation for medical care -- Periodicals; 362.19892
• DOI: 10.1080/02739615.2014.996884
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0273-9615

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The objective of this research was to spatially analyze linked health data for geographic trends in factors impacting children's health. Traditional linear regression analyses of county-level data tend to inflate R 2 . Spatial regression represents a robust approach for improved analysis of geographic data. Methods: We used GeoDa 1.6.0 to regress 3, 221 U.S. county-level child health outcomes (e.g., infant mortality, child mortality) on independent variables (e.g., low birth weight, percent race/ethnicity, uninsured, emotional support). Statistical analyses included spatial R 2, Moran's I, and multicollinearity measures. The data source was the 2014 County Health Rankings. Results: Three spatial regression models (health, socioeconomic, and combined) were compared for infant and child mortality. The combined model for infant mortality rate yielded the largest adjusted R 2 = 0.428 ( F = 110.9, p < 0.001), similarly for child mortality rate R 2 = 0.411 ( F = 94.3, p < 0.001). The strongest predictors in both models were obesity, smoking, teen birth rate, severe housing problems, no social supports, and urbanicity. Discussion: The results demonstrate correlations between county-level conditions and child health outcomes, supporting previous research linking poor health/education and low socioeconomic conditions. Geospatial information can assist policymakers to apply health education interventions.