Strategies to promote family–professional collaboration: two case reports. Issue 18 (27th August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Strategies to promote family–professional collaboration: two case reports. Issue 18 (27th August 2016)
- Main Title:
- Strategies to promote family–professional collaboration: two case reports
- Authors:
- An, Mihee
Palisano, Robert J.
Dunst, Carl J.
Chiarello, Lisa A.
Yi, Chung-hwi
Gracely, Edward J. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: Although research supports family–professional collaboration, challenges to implementation have been reported. The case reports describe the implementation of a 4-step practice model that incorporates specific strategies to facilitate family–professional collaboration. Method: The participants were two mothers of children with physical disabilities and two physical therapists. Therapists received instruction in the strategies for collaboration including client-centred interview, visualising a preferred future, scaling questions, and family routine and activity matrix. The intervention was implemented during 6-weekly sessions. The 2nd and 5th sessions were videotaped to analyse the interactions between the parent and therapist using Response Class Matrix. Telephone interviews were conducted to explore participants' experiences. Results: Therapists were able to implement all strategies following 6 h of instruction. Analysis of the videotapes indicated that mother–therapist interactions were characterised by sharing information and open communication in a mutually supportive manner. Interviews with the mothers and therapists indicated that the therapists engaged the mothers in the intervention process and tailored interventions to child and family needs. The scaling questions were difficult to implement (therapists) and answer (parents). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the strategies can be used by therapists to promote collaboration and involve parentsAbstract: Purpose: Although research supports family–professional collaboration, challenges to implementation have been reported. The case reports describe the implementation of a 4-step practice model that incorporates specific strategies to facilitate family–professional collaboration. Method: The participants were two mothers of children with physical disabilities and two physical therapists. Therapists received instruction in the strategies for collaboration including client-centred interview, visualising a preferred future, scaling questions, and family routine and activity matrix. The intervention was implemented during 6-weekly sessions. The 2nd and 5th sessions were videotaped to analyse the interactions between the parent and therapist using Response Class Matrix. Telephone interviews were conducted to explore participants' experiences. Results: Therapists were able to implement all strategies following 6 h of instruction. Analysis of the videotapes indicated that mother–therapist interactions were characterised by sharing information and open communication in a mutually supportive manner. Interviews with the mothers and therapists indicated that the therapists engaged the mothers in the intervention process and tailored interventions to child and family needs. The scaling questions were difficult to implement (therapists) and answer (parents). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the strategies can be used by therapists to promote collaboration and involve parents in setting goals and the intervention process. Implications for Rehabilitation: Strategies to promote parent–therapist collaboration include client-centred interview, visualising a preferred future, scaling questions, and family routine and activity matrix. Therapists with no previous instruction or training on family-centred services successfully implemented the strategies following 6 h of instruction. Interactions between two parent–physical therapist dyads were characterised by sharing information and open communication in a mutually supportive manner following therapist instruction in strategies for parent–therapist collaboration. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Disability and rehabilitation. Volume 38:Issue 18(2016)
- Journal:
- Disability and rehabilitation
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Issue 18(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 18 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 18
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0038-0018-0000
- Page Start:
- 1844
- Page End:
- 1858
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08-27
- Subjects:
- Children with disabilities -- goal-setting -- parent involvement -- parent–therapist interaction
People with disabilities -- Periodicals
Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
617.03 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/idre20 ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/dre ↗
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09638288.asp ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107763 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0963-8288
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3595.420300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2470.xml