Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them. Issue 2 (17th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Flanagan, Kieron; Uyarra, Elvira
• Is Part Of: Industry and innovation. Volume 23:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 177
• Page End: 188
• Publication Date: 2016-02-17
• Subjects: Innovation policy -- implementation -- policy mixes -- evaluation -- co-ordination; Industries -- Periodicals; Industrial management -- Periodicals; Industrial policy -- Periodicals; 338.005
• DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1366-2716

Abstract

Abstract: The field of innovation policy studies is at a crossroads. It has clearly been influential. However, might it be losing the critical insight necessary to remain so in future? We discuss four dangerous tendencies seen in many innovation policy studies: idealising policy rationales and policy-makers; treating policies as tools from a toolbox; putting too much faith in coordination and intelligent design of 'policy mixes'; and taking an atemporal approach to innovation policy. Based on these we identify some ways forward that, we argue, would deal better with the complex multi-actor dynamics, fundamental uncertainties and challenges to the implementation, coordination and evaluation of policies and which would make for more relevant and impactful innovation policy studies.