Does Antigone Stand or Fall in Relation to Hegel's Master–Slave dialectic? A Response to Derrida's Glas. Issue 2 (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chanter, Tina
• Is Part Of: Paragraph. Volume 39:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 202
• Page End: 219
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: sexual difference -- feminist -- Antigone -- master–slave dialectic -- Derrida -- Hegel -- Glas -- self-consciousness; Criticism -- Periodicals; Literature -- History and criticism -- Periodicals; Art criticism -- Periodicals; 809
• DOI: 10.3366/para.2016.0195
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8334

Abstract

Abstract : In Glas, Derrida focuses his attention on a question regarding the family, on the unintelligibility of familial love for which Hegel makes Antigone representative. The account of the emergence of self-consciousness in the family differs in several crucial ways from the standard account of how Hegelian self-consciousness is constituted in the master–slave dialectic. Most notably, the achievement of self-consciousness through familial love involves no risk of life, no struggle to the death, no conflict. While Derrida refrains from interrogating the relation between the master–slave dialectic and sexual difference directly, he interrogates the peaceful recognition that Hegel says occurs between Polynices as brother and Antigone as sister. I explore the silences that punctuate Derrida's discussion of Antigone, especially his silence on Hegel's twofold elision of the master–slave dialectic with the husband–wife relation, and of Antigone with the figure of the wife. By symbolically marrying her off, Hegel subordinates Antigone to a symbolic husband.