Efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations approved in the US for the management of COPD. (2nd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Banerji, Donald; Mahler, Donald A.; Hanania, Nicola A.
• Is Part Of: Expert review of respiratory medicine. Volume 10:Number 7(2016)
• Page Start: 767
• Page End: 780
• Publication Date: 2016-07-02
• Subjects: Dyspnea -- health status -- long-acting β2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist -- lung function -- indacaterol/glycopyrrolate -- safety -- St George's Respiratory Questionnaire -- tiotropium/olodaterol -- Transition Dyspnea Index -- umeclidinium/vilanterol; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.2005
• DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1190276
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-6348

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction : Long-acting β2 -agonists [LABAs] and long-acting muscarinic antagonists [LAMAs]) are primary therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with these therapies, there is room to optimize outcomes further. Combined use of LABAs and LAMAs is recommended when symptoms are not improved with a single agent, and LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are at the forefront of drug development in COPD. Areas covered : This review focusses on the three LABA/LAMA FDCs (indacaterol/glycopyrrolate 1 [IND/GLY] 27.5/15.6 µg twice daily, umeclidinium/vilanterol [UMEC/VI] 62.5/25 µg once daily and tiotropium/olodaterol [Tio/Olo] 5/5 µg once daily approved in the US. Phase III clinical trials have shown benefits in lung function, dyspnea and health status with FDCs of IND/GLY, UMEC/VI and Tio/Olo versus placebo and monotherapies. Expert commentary : Data from recent studies of three LABA/LAMA combinations, reviewed here, indicate that dual bronchodilation may be beneficial above and beyond both the monotherapies and LABA/ICS combinations, in providing improvements in lung function and PROs for patients with COPD, which may encourage a shift away from the use of ICS in COPD management, in particular for non-exacerbating patients.