Variations in public and private employees' perceptions of organizational preparedness for natural disasters. (2nd April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sadiq, Abdul-Akeem; Tyler, Jenna
• Is Part Of: Environmental hazards. Volume 15:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 160
• Page End: 177
• Publication Date: 2016-04-02
• Subjects: Disaster preparedness -- public and private organizations -- environmental hazards -- publicness -- social identity theory; Environmental disasters -- Periodicals; Environmental disasters -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Natural disasters -- Periodicals; Natural disasters -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; 363.7005
• DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2016.1167010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-7891

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Studies have demonstrated that public and private organizations differ in many respects (e.g. funding mechanisms and risk-taking capabilities). Based on this scholarship, we expect to see differences in their disaster preparedness levels. Hence, we propose the following research question: Are there variations in public and private employees' perceptions of organizational preparedness for natural disasters? We answer this question by employing the theories of publicness and social identity. We define publicness through the core approach arguing that public and private organizations are uniquely different based on their legal status or ownership and social identity as an individual's feeling of oneness or belongingness to a particular group or organization. Using data gathered in 2014 from a nationally representative sample of 1634 public and private employees in the United States, we posit that employees of private organizations will report higher preparedness levels in comparison to employees of public organizations. Our proposition is based on scholarship that found a negative relationship between publicness and organizational identification and a positive relationship between organizational identification and organizational performance. Contrary to our proposition, but in line with the disaster literature, the results showed that in general, employees of public organizations reported a higher preparedness level than employees of private organizations.