Sleep monitoring of a six-day microcycle in strength and high-intensity training. Issue 5 (3rd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kölling, Sarah; Wiewelhove, Thimo; Raeder, Christian; Endler, Stefan; Ferrauti, Alexander; Meyer, Tim; Kellmann, Michael
• Is Part Of: European journal of sport science. Volume 16:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 507
• Page End: 515
• Publication Date: 2016-07-03
• Subjects: Recovery -- fatigue -- training -- endurance -- strength; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1041062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1746-1391

Abstract

Abstract: This study examined the effect of microcycles in eccentric strength and high-intensity interval training (HIT) on sleep parameters and subjective ratings. Forty-two well-trained athletes (mean age 23.2 ± 2.4 years) were either assigned to the strength ( n = 21; mean age 23.6 ± 2.1 years) or HIT ( n = 21; mean age 22.8 ± 2.6 years) protocol. Sleep monitoring was conducted with multi-sensor actigraphy (SenseWear Armband™, Bodymedia, Pittsburg, PA, USA) and sleep log for 14 days. After a five-day baseline phase, participants completed either eccentric accented strength or high-intensity interval training for six days, with two training sessions per day. This training phase was divided into two halves (part 1 and 2) for statistical analyses. A three-day post phase concluded the monitoring. The Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes was applied at baseline, end of part 2, and at the last post-day. Mood ratings were decreased during training, but returned to baseline values afterwards in both groups. Sleep parameters in the strength group remained constant over the entire process. The HIT group showed trends of unfavourable sleep during the training phase (e.g., objective sleep efficiency at part 2: mean = 83.6 ± 7.8%, F 3, 60 = 2.57, P = 0.06, = 0.114) and subjective improvements during the post phase for awakenings ( F 3, 60 = 2.96, P = 0.04, = 0.129) and restfulness of sleep ( F 3, 60 = 9.21, P < 0.001, = 0.315). Thus, the HIT protocol seems to increase higher recovery demands than strength training, and sufficient sleep time should be emphasised and monitored.