Social and Technical Determinants of Perceived Contract Performance: Rules, Autonomy, and Ethics. Issue 3 (2nd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davis, Randall S.; Girth, Amanda M.; Stazyk, Edmund C.
• Is Part Of: Public performance & management review. Volume 39:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 728
• Page End: 755
• Publication Date: 2016-07-02
• Subjects: administrative ethics, contract performance -- social determinants -- technical determinants; Civil service -- Labor productivity -- Periodicals; Civil service -- Labor productivity -- United States -- Periodicals; Government productivity -- Periodicals; Government productivity -- United States -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Periodicals; Public administration -- United States -- Periodicals; Civil service -- Labor productivity; Government productivity; Public administration; United States; Periodicals; 351.05
• DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1137773
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1530-9576

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Contracting for services represents one mechanism employed to improve the performance of government agencies. While research examining contract performance sheds substantial light on the circumstances under which contracting achieves intended goals, it has rarely considered how the technical and human factors of the contracting process jointly affect contract performance. As a result, relatively little is known about how human factors affect contract performance under shifting technical contingencies. This gap is addressed by exploring how autonomy over contract management and perceived ethical behavior (social factors) are contingent upon changes in contract rules training (a technical factor). The study finds that contract managers who have had more rules training tend to believe that they have less autonomy and view the behaviors of others as unethical. Findings also indicate that more training in contracting rules may inhibit perceived contract performance when mediated by autonomy and perceptions of ethical behaviors.