Age differences in suggestibility to contradictions of demonstrated knowledge: the influence of prior knowledge. Issue 6 (1st November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Umanath, Sharda
• Is Part Of: Aging, neuropsychology, and cognition. Volume 23:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 744
• Page End: 767
• Publication Date: 2016-11-01
• Subjects: Aging -- knowledge -- suggestibility -- memory -- semantic illusions; Aging -- Periodicals; Cognition in old age -- Periodicals; Cognition disorders in old age -- Periodicals; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Aging -- periodicals; Neuropsychology -- periodicals; Cognition -- periodicals; Mental Disorders -- periodicals; Gerontology -- periodicals; Mental Health -- periodicals; 155.67
• DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1167161
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1382-5585

Abstract

ABSTRACT: People maintain intact general knowledge into very old age and use it to support remembering. Interestingly, when older and younger adults encounter errors that contradict general knowledge, older adults suffer fewer memorial consequences: Older adults use fewer recently-encountered errors as answers for later knowledge questions. Why do older adults show this reduced suggestibility, and what role does their intact knowledge play? In three experiments, I examined suggestibility following exposure to errors in fictional stories that contradict general knowledge. Older adults consistently demonstrated more prior knowledge than younger adults but also gained access to even more across time. Additionally, they did not show a reduction in new learning from the stories, indicating lesser involvement of episodic memory failures. Critically, when knowledge was stably accessible, older adults relied more heavily on that knowledge compared to younger adults, resulting in reduced suggestibility. Implications for the broader role of knowledge in aging are discussed.