Detection of Airborne Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Inside and Downwind of a Swine Building, and in Animal Feed: Potential Occupational, Animal Health, and Environmental Implications. Issue 2 (2nd April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Detection of Airborne Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Inside and Downwind of a Swine Building, and in Animal Feed: Potential Occupational, Animal Health, and Environmental Implications. Issue 2 (2nd April 2016)
- Main Title:
- Detection of Airborne Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Inside and Downwind of a Swine Building, and in Animal Feed: Potential Occupational, Animal Health, and Environmental Implications
- Authors:
- Ferguson, Dwight D.
Smith, Tara C.
Hanson, Blake M.
Wardyn, Shylo E.
Donham, Kelley J. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Aerosolized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was sampled inside and downwind of a swine facility. Animal feed was sampled before and after entry into the swine facility. Aerosolized particles were detected using an optical particle counter for real-time measurement and with an Andersen sampler to detect viable MRSA. Molecular typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed on samples collected. Viable MRSA organisms isolated inside the swine facility were primarily associated with particles >5 µm, and those isolated downwind from the swine facility were associated with particles <5 µm. MRSA isolates included spa types t008, t034, and t5706 and were resistant to methicillin, tetracycline, clindamycin, and erythromycin. Animal feed both before and after entry into the swine facility tested positive for viable MRSA. These isolates were of similar spa types as the airborne MRSA organisms. Air samples collected after power washing with a biocide inside the swine facility resulted in no viable MRSA organisms detected. This pilot study showed that the ecology of MRSA is complex. Additional studies are warranted on the maximum distance that viable MRSA can be emitted outside the facility, and the possibility that animal feed may be a source of contamination.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of agromedicine. Volume 21:Issue 2(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of agromedicine
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 2(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0021-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 149
- Page End:
- 153
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04-02
- Subjects:
- Agriculture -- air sampling -- animal feeding operation -- bioaerosol -- confined -- MRSA -- swine -- zoonosis
Agriculture -- Health aspects -- Periodicals
Agricultural laborers -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals
616.9803 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.haworthpress.com/store/product.asp?sku=J096 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wagr20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1142917 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1059-924X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4926.240000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 111.xml