When Democracies Denationalize: The Epistemological Case against Revoking Citizenship. Issue 2 (2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cohen, Elizabeth F.
• Is Part Of: Ethics & international affairs. Volume 30:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 253
• Page End: 259
• Publication Date: 2016
• Subjects: International relations -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; 172.405
• DOI: 10.1017/S0892679416000113
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0892-6794

Abstract

Abstract : Discomfort with denationalization spans both proceduralist and consequentialist objections. I augment Patti Lenard's arguments against denationalization with an epistemological argument. What makes denationalization problematic for democratic theorists are not simply the procedures used to impose this penalty or its consequences but also the permanence of this type of punishment. Because democratic theory assumes citizens to be subject to developmental processes that can substantially alter a person's character in politically relevant ways, I argue in favor of states imposing only revocable punishments. Penalties removing people's rights and political standing must be accompanied by avenues for periodic reconsideration of such punishments in order to meet Lenard's standard of democratic legitimacy.