Beyond fairness: the ethics of inclusion for transgender and intersex athletes. Issue 2 (3rd May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gleaves, John; Lehrbach, Tim
• Is Part Of: Journal of the philosophy of sport. Volume 43:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 311
• Page End: 326
• Publication Date: 2016-05-03
• Subjects: Transgender -- intersex -- gender -- narratives; Sports -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 796.01
• DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2016.1157485
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8705

Abstract

Abstract: Sporting communities remain entangled in debate over whether and how to include transgender and intersex athletes in competition with cisgender athletes. Of particular concern is that transgender and intersex athletes may have unfair physiological advantages over their cisgender opponents. Arguments for inclusion of transgender and intersex athletes in sport attempt to demonstrate that such inclusion does not threaten the presumed physiological equivalence among competitors and is therefore fair to all. This article argues that the physiological equivalency rationale has significant limitations, including an inordinate emphasis on sport as a comparative test. Instead, this article contends that arguments for narrativity rather than physiological equivalency show that exclusion is not only misguided but also undesirable: it is detrimental not only to the excluded athletes but to sport itself. The article yields several important consequences including calls for revisions to policies on transgender and intersex athletes.