Ideological Clarity in Multiparty Competition: A New Measure and Test Using Election Manifestos. Issue 3 (14th July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lo, James; Proksch, Sven-Oliver; Slapin, Jonathan B.
• Is Part Of: British journal of political science. Volume 46:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 591
• Page End: 610
• Publication Date: 2014-07-14
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1017/S0007123414000192
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1234

Abstract

Abstract : Parties in advanced democracies take ideological positions as part of electoral competition, but some parties communicate their position more clearly than others. Existing research on democratic party competition has paid much attention to assessing partisan position taking in electoral manifestos, but it has largely overlooked how manifestos reflect the clarity of these positions. This article presents a scaling procedure that better reflects the data-generating process of party manifestos. This new estimator allows us to recover not only positional estimates, but also estimates for the ideological clarity or ambiguity of parties. The study validates its results using Monte Carlo tests, a manifesto-drafting simulation and a human coding exercise. Finally, the article applies the estimator to party manifestos in four multiparty democracies and demonstrates that ambiguity can enhance the appeal of parties with platforms that become more moderate, and lessen the appeal of parties with platforms that become more extreme.