Utilization and Toxicity of Alternative Delivery Methods of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer. Issue 6 (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wright, Jason D.; Hou, June Y.; Burke, William M.; Tergas, Ana I.; Chen, Ling; Hu, Jim C.; Ananth, Cande V.; Neugut, Alfred I.; Hershman, Dawn L.
• Is Part Of: Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 127:Issue 6(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; 618
• DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001436
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0029-7844

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVE: Compared with conventional intravenous platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, both intraperitoneal chemotherapy and more frequent dose-dense intravenous chemotherapy have been associated with improved survival in some studies. We examined the utilization and toxicity of these three methods of chemotherapy delivery in women with ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a population-based study and analyzed data on women with ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery followed by platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2013 who were recorded in the MarketScan database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was classified as: intraperitoneal chemotherapy, dose-dense chemotherapy (weekly administration of chemotherapy), or standard chemotherapy (every 3 weeks). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for chemotherapy-associated complications and costs were recorded and compared using χ 2 tests. RESULTS: A total of 5, 892 patients, including 4, 135 (70.2%) who received standard chemotherapy, 859 (14.6%) who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and 898 (15.2%) treated with dose-dense chemotherapy, were identified. From 2009 to 2013, use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy remained constant (16.3–16.3%), whereas use of dose-dense therapy increased (8.7–18.1%) ( P <.001). Hospitalizations for chemotherapy-associated complications occurred in 21.3% of women receiving standard chemotherapy, 34.7% of patients treated with intraperitoneal therapy, and in 25.2% of those receiving dose-dense treatment ( P <.001); emergency department visits occurred in 18.3%, 26.3%, and 20.3%, respectively ( P <.001). The largest differences in hospitalizations and emergency department visits were seen for gastrointestinal toxicities and electrolyte disorders. The per-patient costs of hospitalization were higher for intraperitoneal chemotherapy than other treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was used in less than 15% of women with ovarian cancer, whereas use of dose-dense chemotherapy is increasing. Although we did not examine survival, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is significantly more toxic than the other methods of treatment. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is used in less than 15% of women with ovarian cancer, whereas use of dose-dense chemotherapy is increasing.