High-performance detection and early prediction of septic shock for alcohol-use disorder patients. (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Calvert, Jacob; Desautels, Thomas; Chettipally, Uli; Barton, Christopher; Hoffman, Jana; Jay, Melissa; Mao, Qingqing; Mohamadlou, Hamid; Das, Ritankar
• Is Part Of: Annals of medicine and surgery. Volume 8(2016)
• Page Start: 50
• Page End: 55
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: Alcohol use disorder -- Clinical decision support systems -- Septic shock -- Sepsis -- Electronic health records; Surgery -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; General Surgery -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 617
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.04.023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-0801

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The presence of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) complicates the medical conditions of patients and increases the difficulty of detecting and predicting the onset of septic shock for patients in the ICU. Methods: We have developed a high-performance sepsis prediction algorithm, InSight, which outperforms existing methods for AUD patient populations. InSight analyses a combination of singlets, doublets, and triplets of clinical measurements over time to generate a septic shock risk score. AUD patients obtained from the MIMIC III database were used in this retrospective study to train InSight and compare performance with the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) for septic shock prediction and detection. Results: From 4-fold cross validation, InSight performs particularly well on diagnostic odds ratio and demonstrates a relatively high Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) metric. Four hours prior to onset, InSight had an average AUROC of 0.815, and at the time of onset, InSight had an average AUROC value of 0.965. When applied to patient populations where AUD may complicate prediction methods of sepsis, InSight outperforms existing diagnostic tools. Conclusions: Analysis of the higher order correlations and trends between relevant clinical measurements using the InSight algorithm leads to more accurate detection and prediction of septic shock, even in cases where diagnosis may be confounded by AUD. Highlights: At 93% sensitivity, InSight reduces false alarms by >80% over other detection tools. InSight 's diagnostic odds ratio is >30X those of MEWS, SAPS II, SIRS for detection. InSight outperforms comparable methods for septic shock prediction hours before onset.